Last updated: June 2026 — James Whitfield, Coparchaeology

```html

How We Rate

Our Review Methodology at Coparchaeology

Every review published on Coparchaeology.co.uk follows a structured, repeatable methodology developed and applied personally by site owner James Whitfield. This page explains exactly how we evaluate non Gamstop betting sites so you can trust the scores you see and make informed decisions about where to play.

We do not accept payment from operators in exchange for positive coverage. Every rating reflects genuine, hands-on testing — nothing more, nothing less.

Who Does the Testing?

James Whitfield personally tests every non Gamstop betting site before a review is published on Coparchaeology. James has spent years evaluating offshore and internationally licensed operators serving UK players, building up a detailed understanding of what separates a trustworthy site from a risky one. No review is outsourced, automated, or based solely on operator-supplied information. James creates real accounts, deposits real money, places real bets, and contacts customer support directly before writing a single word of assessment.

Our Step-by-Step Review Process

Step 1 — Initial Research

Before signing up, James researches the operator's background: licensing history, ownership, any regulatory actions or player complaints, and how long the site has been active. This background check sets the context for everything that follows.

Step 2 — Account Registration

James registers a real account using standard UK player details. We assess how long sign-up takes, what verification documents are requested, and whether the process is straightforward or unnecessarily complicated.

Step 3 — Deposit and Withdrawal Testing

A real deposit is made using at least two different payment methods. After testing the site, a withdrawal is requested to measure processing speed, any fees applied, and how smoothly the cashout experience runs end to end.

Step 4 — Bonus Claiming

Where a welcome bonus is available, James claims it and reads the full terms carefully. We check wagering requirements, time limits, eligible games, maximum bet rules, and whether the bonus is genuinely valuable or riddled with restrictive conditions.

Step 5 — Game and Betting Market Exploration

James browses and plays across the sports betting markets, casino games, or both, depending on what the site offers. We test game loading speeds, software providers, live betting functionality, and the depth of markets available to UK players.

Step 6 — Customer Support Contact

James contacts the support team via live chat and, where available, email. We record response times, the quality of answers given, and whether agents are knowledgeable about the site's own policies.

Step 7 — Mobile Testing

The site is accessed and used on a mobile device, testing both browser performance and any dedicated app. We assess navigation, loading times, and whether the full feature set is available on smaller screens.

Step 8 — Scoring and Writing

After completing all testing steps, James assigns a score across six weighted criteria and writes the final review. No score is finalised until all testing is complete.

Rating Criteria and Weightings

Each site receives a final score out of 10, built from six individual category scores. The weightings below reflect how much each category influences the overall rating:

Category Weighting What We Assess
Licensing and Safety 25% Valid licence jurisdiction, SSL encryption, responsible gambling tools, fair terms
Bonuses and Promotions 20% Welcome offer value, wagering requirements, ongoing promotions, transparency of terms
Game and Betting Selection 20% Range of sports markets, casino game variety, software providers, live options
Payment Methods 15% Deposit and withdrawal options, processing times, fees, minimum and maximum limits
Customer Support 10% Availability hours, response speed, quality of assistance, contact channels offered
Mobile Experience 10% Mobile site performance, app availability, navigation ease, feature completeness

Our Rating Scale Explained

Every site on Coparchaeology receives a final score from 1 to 10. Here is how to interpret those scores:

How Coparchaeology Stays Independent and Unbiased

Independence is the foundation of everything we publish. Here is how we protect editorial integrity on Coparchaeology:

If you have questions about our methodology or want to report an inaccuracy in any review, you are welcome to get in touch with James Whitfield directly through the contact page on Coparchaeology.co.uk.

```